Site Home >> About Us >> Place Your Link >> Privacy Policy >> ToS >> Add Your Article
Search:   
theartcircle.com theartcircle.com
Add Url
 

Society & Issues

Investment & Finance

Shopping & Auction

Politics & Government

Self Help

Fashion & Relationships

Academics & Learning

Property & Estate

Drink & Food

Computers & Networking

Issues & News

Travel & Vacation

Technology & Science

Online & Indoor Games

Business & Commerce

Sports & Adventure

Teens & Children

Recreation & Entertainment

Automotive

Hygiene & Health

Home Family & Garden

Art & Creative

Employment & Careers

Medical Care

 

Site Home » Academics & Learning » K-12 Education
 

Three Arizona Schools Candidates Hold Differing Views

 
Author: Patricia Hawke
Three candidates are running for the post of Superintendent of Public Instruction for the Arizona schools in the September 12th election. Current Superintendent Tom Horne is running as the unopposed Republican candidate, seeking his second term in office. Two Democrats are challenging HorneSlade Mead and Jason Williams. Mead is a sports agent, a former state senator, a former Kyrene School District board member, and a former Republican. Williams is a former middle school math and science teacher, and a former executive director of a nonprofit organization that recruits teachers for low-income and rural areas.

Two major issues that will be facing the newly elected superintendent are the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) tests and school vouchers.

AIMS. This year was the first to require all high school seniors in the Arizona schools to pass the AIMS test in order to graduate. The candidates have differing views on AIMS and its use.

Horne is a strong advocate of the graduation requirement, believing that it makes students accountable for what they learn. He commented that it makes Arizona schools students take their education seriously, because they will not be handed a diploma if they fake their way through school.

Williams would like the graduation requirement eliminated and to use AIMS as a benchmark for learning, gauging just how well Arizona schools students are retaining knowledge. He believes this would take the pressure off students, when used as a diagnostic tool. Williams disagrees with Horne concerning students taking learning more seriously because of AIMS. He noted that 15,000 students, who enrolled as Arizona schools freshmen in 2002, had dropped out of school before the Class of 2006 graduated.

Mead agrees with Williams that AIMS would make a better assessment tool for the Arizona schools and that the passing requirement for graduation be eliminated. He has stated that the current administration of AIMS is a 'sham' with only a passing grade requirement of 59 percent. A 'C' average student within the Arizona schools only need answer six mathematics questions correctly out of 56. He also would like to see AIMS administered as the state of Wyoming does its testingstudents take the test directly on a computer, the results are instantly scored, and then the scores are immediately sent to the teachers for evaluation.

School Vouchers. Another hot button for many educators, parents and the community are school vouchers, whereby some students may attend private schools funded by the taxpayers. Under a newly passed budget, that state has authorized $5 million in private school vouchers for disabled and foster-care students. All three candidates are opposed to vouchers for private schools.

Incumbent Horne stated that Arizona schools already are the leading proponent for parental choice in the nation, with charter schools, open enrollment policies, and tax credits. He noted that the Manhattan Institute ranks the Arizona schools as number one out of 50 in parental choice. He also pointed out that the state constitution prohibits the use of public funds for religious or private schools.

Because the state legislature already passed the use of school vouchers into law, Mead only stated his opposition to them and that, if elected, he would ensure that the Arizona schools accounted for every cent used for school vouchers.

Williams pointed out that private schools do not automatically do a better job than public ones. He sees the voucher system as a way of giving up on public education in the Arizona schools.

Though these are the two hot-button issues in this upcoming election, undoubtedly there are many more for which the parents and communities of the Arizona schools should be concerned. Ensure that you check out the three candidates and what they have to say about all of the issuesand make your voice heard in September by voting for the candidate of your choice.

Author Bio:

Patricia Hawke is a staff writer for Schools K-12, providing free, in-depth reports on all U.S. public and private K-12 schools. Patricia has a nose for research and writes stimulating news and views on school issues. For more on Orlando schools visit www.schoolsk-12.com/Florida/Orlando/index.html

You can search for this article using: Three Arizona Schools Candidates Hold Differing Views, Academics & Learning, K-12 Education
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
NASA Budget VS Social Programs
 
College sports betting
 
Why are so many students unsatisfied with the quality of essays written by custom research companies?
 
Liiberation From Material Bondage Via a Spiritual Vision
 
NCAA Mascot Mayhem Continues?CJonathan Munk
 
Speed Reading Basics
 
Immune System Genes Reveal Surprises
 
I??ll Teach You How To Discover Real Residual Income Business Opportunity
 
College: Reasons You Should Not Go
 
Early History of Small Genome Sequencing
 
 
 
Site Home >> Privacy Policy >> ToS
Copyright © 2006-2008 www.theartcircle.com - All Rights Reserved.